Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼­¿ï½Ã³»¿¡ °ÅÁÖÇÏ´Â 13¼¼-15¼¼ û¼Ò³âµéÀÇ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿ªÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸

PREVALENCE AND SEVERITY OF MALOCCLUSION IN CHILDREN 13 TO 15 YEARS OF AGE LIVING IN SEOUL

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1984³â 11±Ç 1È£ p.121 ~ 130
¼Û°æ¿ø, ±èÁøÅÂ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼Û°æ¿ø (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »êºÎÀΰúÇб³½Ç
±èÁøÅ (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
¼­¿ï½Ã³» 9°³ ÁßÇб³ÀÇ 13¼¼-15¼¼ û¼Ò³â 981¸í (³²: 467, ¿©: 1 514)¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î HMAR
°ú Angle ºÐ·ù¹ý¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÏ¿© ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÇ ¹ß»ýºóµµ, ½Éµµ ¹× Ä¡·á¿ä±¸µµ¸¦ Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½
°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. HMAR¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Æò°¡ °á°ú Á¶»ç´ë»óÀÇ 12.1%°¡ ÈǸ¢ÇÑ ±³ÇÕÀ» ¼ÒÁöÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ
´Ù(score 0)
2. Á¶»ç´ë»óÀÇ 14%´Â ¡°±³Á¤Ä¡·á°¡ ¸Å¿ì ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏ´Ù¡± ¿Í ¡°Ä¡·á°¡ ¹Ýµå½Ã ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù¡±·Î
Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù.
3. HMARÀ» ´Üµ¶ »ç¿ëÇßÀ»¶§ º¸´Ù º¸Á¶±â·ÏºÎ¸¦ ÇÔ²² »ç¿ëÇßÀ»¶§ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÇ ½ÉµµºÐ¼®ÀÌ
´õ ¹Î°¨ÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
4. Angle¾¾ ºÐ·ù¿¡ ÀÇÇϸé Àüü ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ ñé Class IÀÌ 77.4 %, Class ¥±, Division 1ÀÌ
1.3%, Class ¥±, Division 2°¡ 0.9% Class ¥²°¡ 11.3%¸¦ Á¡À¯ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
5. Angle Class IÀÇ HMAR Æò±ÕÄ¡´Â Class ¥±, Division 1 À̳ª Class ¥²ÀÇ Æò±ÕÄ¡º¸´Ù
³·¾Ò´Ù.
6. ¡°Ä¡·á¿ä±¸µµ¡±¿Í HMAR Á¡¼ö»çÀÌ¿¡´Â ¿¬°ü¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç ¡°Ä¡·á¿ä±¸µµ¡±°¡ Ä¿Áú¼ö·Ï
HMAR Æò±ÕÄ¡µµ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Childrens between the ages of 13 ails 15 years, living in Seoul, were examined in
order to determine the prevalence and severity of malocclusion in the permanent
dentition.
This survey encompassed 981 children and an individual chart was prepared for each
subject recording an origin HMAR score and classification of occlusion according to
Angle.
Also, subjective evaluation of ¡°treatment needs¡± was carried out in 581 children.
The results were as follows:
1. Of the 981 children in this survey, 12.1 percent showed excellent occlusion.(0 point)
2. The 14 percent of the children who had a score of 24 and above all appeared to
belong to the ¡°treatment highly desirable¡± or ¡°treatment mandatory¡± category.
3. The incorporation of SAR (Supplementary Assessment Record) into the HMAR can
provide more sensitive method for evaluating severity of malocclusion.
4. According to Angle¡¯s classification 77.4 percent of all malocclusion belonged to
Class ¥°, 1.3 percent to Class ¥±, Division 1, 0.9 percent to Class ¥±, Division 2, and
11.3 percent to Class ¥².
5. The mean HMAR score for Class I was significantly lower than for either Class
¥±, Division 1 or Class ¥².(P<0.05)
6. A close relationship was found between the degree If ¡°treatment needs¡± and the
value obtained by the HMAR scoring. (chi-square test, p<0.05) The differences between
the mean HMAR scores of the various subjectively defined categories were statistically
significant.(P<0.001)

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI